← Back to blog
Engineering Playbooks

If I Needed Resilient Software in 30 Days, Here’s the SOLID Way I’d Do It

SOLID for modern software: single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov, interface segregation, dependency inversion—clean interfaces, swappable parts, safer fallbacks, testable pipelines.

By Rev.AISomething

Team planning architecture on a whiteboard representing solid foundations

Features break for boring reasons: brittle dependencies, hard-coded providers, and untested fallbacks. SOLID—Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov substitution, Interface Segregation, Dependency Inversion—still applies when you add AI or any external service. Here’s a concise playbook to keep changes cheap and behavior predictable.

What you’ll get:

  • SOLID applied to service/AI pipelines without code
  • Swap-safe adapters (Open/Closed, Liskov)
  • Safer fallbacks and caching boundaries (Single Responsibility)
  • Thin, testable interfaces for clients (Interface Segregation)
  • Dependency Injection for providers and evaluators (Dependency Inversion)
  • A short checklist to keep regressions low

S — Single Responsibility

Keep ingestion, retrieval, generation, and post-processing as separate concerns. One module fetches contexts, another calls a service, another formats the answer. This makes caching, testing, and swapping easier.

Why it helps:

  • When a provider is slow, you can cache or swap just the retrieval stage without touching answer formatting.
  • Tests stay small: feed canned inputs to one stage and assert outputs, no network required.
  • Incidents shrink in scope because each stage has a single metric to watch (e.g., retrieval p95, generation error rate).

O — Open/Closed

Add new providers or tools by adding implementations, not rewriting callers. Define a stable contract for “complete,” “embed,” or “rerank,” and register new implementations behind it. Guardrails (limits, defaults) stay in the adapter, not scattered across the codebase.

Why it helps:

  • Adding a new model or tool is additive; existing paths keep working.
  • Risk is contained to the new adapter; blast radius is smaller during rollouts.
  • You can feature-flag new implementations without changing business logic.

L — Liskov Substitution

Any provider should be swappable without breaking the rest of the pipeline. Keep return shapes consistent: success plus metrics; failure with clear error codes. Hide provider-specific fields from callers; keep them in logs for debugging.

Why it helps:

  • Dashboards and billing rely on stable fields (latency, tokens, cache hit); you keep them intact across swaps.
  • Rollbacks are low-friction because interfaces match.
  • Fallback chains work because every step can substitute for another without shape mismatches.

I — Interface Segregation

Expose small, purpose-built interfaces. UI code should see “ask(question) → answer + sources,” not embeddings or headers. Batch jobs can use a thin client without UI concerns. Swapping transport (HTTP → gRPC) or provider should not leak into callers.

Why it helps:

  • Fewer breaking changes when you change transport or provider.
  • Teams can test their slice in isolation (UI doesn’t need embedding details; batch jobs don’t need UI concerns).
  • Security is cleaner: fewer surfaces expose internal or provider-specific data.

D — Dependency Inversion

Depend on interfaces, inject concrete implementations at the edges (env/config). Tests inject fakes; load tests can inject “budget guardrail” clients; production swaps providers via config, not code changes.

Why it helps:

  • Environment-based switches (staging vs prod) don’t require redeploys.
  • Load and chaos tests can simulate failures by swapping implementations.
  • New vendors or versions can be trialed safely behind configuration.

Resilience Patterns for Services (Including AI)

  • Cache at the right layer: cache retrieval results (contexts) separately from model outputs. Use short TTLs for answers; slightly longer for retrieval. Deduplicate requests by prompt hash.
  • Fallbacks: define ordered fallbacks (primary model → cheaper model → template response) with clear metrics on when fallbacks trigger.
  • Budgets: enforce max_tokens and reject overlong inputs early. Add per-tenant rate limits and per-request ceilings.
  • Idempotency: hash inputs to dedupe retries and avoid double-billing.
  • Timeouts: set timeouts per stage; fail fast on retrieval so model calls aren’t wasted when no context exists.
  • Structured logs: log stage, latency_ms, tokens_in, tokens_out, provider, hit_cache, fallback_used.

Testing and Evals

  • Unit-test adapters with fixtures for success, rate limits, and invalid requests.
  • Add contract tests for each provider to ensure the interface stays compatible.
  • Build a small eval set (50–100 Q&A pairs) and run it on each model; store scores so regressions are obvious when swapping.
  • Smoke-test fallbacks by forcing the primary client to fail and verifying the chain.

Operational Runbook

  • Dashboards: p50/p95 latency per stage; error rate by provider; cache hit rate; fallback activation count; spend per tenant.
  • Alarms: elevated timeouts, rising fallback_used, or cache hit rate dropping below a target.
  • Rollouts: feature-flag new models; dark-launch them and compare outputs before switching traffic.
  • Incidents: if providers spike latency, shorten TTLs and raise cache durations to shield users; if accuracy drops, revert to last known good model and reranker.

Checklist to Ship

  • Responsibilities split by layer (inputs, domain logic, outputs) with tests per layer.
  • External services sit behind clear interfaces; adapters are swappable via config.
  • Input validation, timeouts, and rate limits enforced at each boundary.
  • Caching rules defined per layer; metrics emit hit/miss/age so drift is visible.
  • Fallback paths and rollback plan defined and exercised.
  • Contract tests for adapters plus a small acceptance/eval suite tracked when swapping providers.
SOLIDArchitectureSoftware EngineeringResilience

Ready to launch your app?

By submitting this form you agree to our privacy policy.

Quote-ready scopes in 24 hours

  • Quote within 24 hours
  • Response within 2 hours
  • No commitment
We switched from the customer booking tool and the separate staff scheduler for one custom app that handles both. It fits how our shop runs and costs less than what we were paying before.
Lisa NguyenSMB salon owner
Book a free call